About Tim Durham

Cameras

I'm a professional photographer based in Harrow, Middlesex. I started photographing when I was about 7 years old thanks to my grandmother who lent me her box brownie. I remember using it to take pictures in the historic town of Chester. Having demonstrated my ability to actually take sensible pictures I was allowed to graduate to the Kodak 66 camera with it's fold-out bellows lens. I could now change the aperture and shutter speed and had to learn about light and settings. It took 120 roll film that produced 6cm x 6cm negatives and gave me 12 shots per roll of film. 
I moved on to a 35mm compact camera when I was 13. It was OK but wasn't a big advance on the Kodak 66.  



When I was about 14 I started reading photography books . I found a whole load in our local library. In the 60s there were loads of photographers playing with extreme lighting, angular shapes and high contrast black and white printing. Photography as an art form was booming and that was the driving force that lead me and a couple of friends to set up the school Photography Club. Now we could develop our own films and experiment with different printing techniques in the dark room. Those of you who have been down that road will almost certainly agree that seeing a picture appear on a sheet of white paper in a tray of developer is and unforgettable experience.

Getting Started

I bought my first 35mm SLR - an Olympus OM10- when I was 22 . It had a built in light meter and that made getting the exposure right much easier. I added a Tokina zoom lens and I was ready to go. That gave way to an Olympus OM2, a camera with a fantastic reputation. I'm not sure that the pictures looked any different. I shot mostly colour negative so the end product was always at the mercy of the lab that developed and printed my work. (I have a 35mm film scanner and I have been amazed to find that the scans of some of those old negatives are actually very high quality). Years later I realised that whatever camera I had it would only ever be as good as the lens that I was using.



When I was 30 the OM2 gave way to a Canon EOS film camera - my first auto-focus camera. That lasted until digital came along. Eventually I took the plunge and bought a Canon 450D digital SLR. Then I added a Canon 7D. Today I use Canon 5D Mk 3s. Digital cameras are basically the same as all the other cameras I have owned - good photographs come from what you see and not what you buy - except for two things. First, I can take as many shots as I like - they don't cost anything! Secondly I can take more shots than I need. The latest memory card can hold 10,000 RAW images. That's a long way from 12 pictures on a roll of 120 roll film!

must have the Latest kit!

So how important is it to have the latest kit? I saw some 6ft x 4ft prints in the National Portrait Gallery a few years ago of pictures taken by David Bailey. The colours were a bit odd, as if the developer used was past its use-by date. Only these were taken at the end of the 1990s on small, digital devices. The pictures were superb. Beautifully posed and beautifully lit. The captured image quality was nowhere near the quality that could have been achieved on film but the final prints were every bit good as you would expect. 

So lesson number one is, and always has been, that the thing you are photographing is way more important than the tools you use to capture the image. I learnt the second lesson after I bought my first really, really good lens (a Canon 85mm f1.4 lens). If you put that lens on a cheap Canon SLR the pictures looked great. So don't spend all your money on the camera body and skimp on the lenses. We do have a selection of lenses that we have bought over the years. We don't have anything we don't need - every one of our lenses has a specific role. 


The "old world" has not gone away. This little portrait was taken in May 2015 on a Nikon FE1 camera using Iford FP4 35mm film. The film was developed at the Harman labs and they sent me high resolution digital scans of the negatives. Instead of pin-sharp digital this shot has a lovely random graininess that, in my view, enhances the picture. 

Passion

My early days in photography were about learning the ropes and then experimentation. The limiting factor was usually a lack of funds to pay for film and prints. Sometimes other things seemed more important - like paying for flying lessons. My sister was (and still is) a massive movie fan and she had books of prints from the Hollywood studios. I was fascinated by the publicity prints of the thirties and the forties and would have loved to have been able to spend time in a studio with real lights and brollies trying to recreate the style they had in those days. Instead my photographic interests stayed routed in documenting the main events in my life and capturing those special moments that came along as the children grew up. I was happy to be an amateur photographer.

Reality

Our first digital SLR arrived in 2008. A Canon 450D. There was also a bit of money available to buy some extras so I bought some strobe lights and some brollies, and started living the dream. Well, I was planning to, but first I had to work out how to take decent, well lit portraits with modern equipment. We found a local studio, took some friends along and had a go at portrait photography in the real world. The practise at home paid off and the pictures I took weren't too bad, as I think this one demonstrates. I shared them the some friends and that lead to our first paid photo-shoot. Very exciting. 

It wasn't all plain sailing. I did some shoots with a portable backdrop which, at times, was not wide enough for some of the group shots. I needed to do a lot of work to make the photos right. My Photoshop skills-set started to expand. 

We had some issues with unexpected shadows and uneven lighting.  My Photoshop skills-set expanded even more. 

Most of all we learnt that adding one or two extra lights gave us less dramatic pictures, more even lighting and happier customers. Not to mention less work in Photoshop.

The Present

Then somebody we we asked if I could photograph a wedding. "Of course" I said. That was the start, although it was our daughter Sarah who actually took on that job. One thing led to another and I have now been photographing weddings with Sarah my wife Linda for over ten years. 

In that time we have done numerous portrait shoots in the studio, engagement shoots (outside when the weather allows it), baby and bump shoots, Weddings and Christenings. Just the one Bar Mitzvah.

I photographed at the London New Year's Day parade for three years in a row. Never once did we have a blue sky and sunshine. I also photographed at the Brexit rallies in 2019 and with candidates for the 2019 election. That was a very interesting time. I also photographed at corporate events and award ceremonies.

In 2016 I had a major photo opportunity with a trip that took in the Grand Canyon, Monument Valley, Bryce Canyon and Las Vegas. I planned to go back to the U.S. in April 2021 and spend some time in Yosemite National Park (following in the footsteps of Ansel Adams). Sadly I'll have to wait another year before I can do that (in turned out to be another two years).

I am now looking to move on from Weddings and Portraits to bigger and better things. I am enjoying landscape photography and I am still learning new ways to enhance photographs in the digital darkroom. 

What did we learn?

1. Wedding Photography is a performance art and you must interact with your audience.
2. You need the right equipment for the job, and nothing else.
3. Photographing for tens hours at a wedding = five days in the gym.
4. Keep you eye on the sun - it has a habit of not being where you need it to be.
5. If you want people to smile then give them a reason.
6. Light changes every hour of every day. If you can try that shot again tomorrow then try it again tomorrow
7. All this camera stuff weighs a ton!
8. If you wouldn't put that shot in an album or hang it on your wall then why are you taking it?

Want to know more?

There are plenty of people who can tell you all about photography. However, I would like to point you to one presentation and one Vlogger that, in my opinion, are head and shoulders above the others.
Check out Thomas Heaton on YouTube. He makes great videos. He is informative. He has no ego. He has a web site and a YouTube channel that I recommend subscribing to if you want to learn more about photography in the real world.
The presentation is by a wonderful man called Michael Melford. This is a delightful 47 minutes of education and humour, perfect for those of you who are interested in landscape photography.
Remember, photography can be frustrating, fun, terrifying and rewarding. Who wouldn't want to experience that?

So if you need a photographer or just need some advice the do contact me.